Awarded as the best online publication by CIDC
Research Paper by N.Balasubramanian,R.B.Karthika and Dr.R.Thenmozhi
Government College Of Technology, Coimbatore-641 013, India
ABSTRACT
This paper comprises of the experimental study of eight double skinned concrete filled steel tubular (DSCFT ) beam columns of concentrically placed circular sections filled with self compacting concrete. Tests on the specimens were made by applying eccentric loads. The main experimental parameters for beam-columns were slenderness ratio and load eccentricity. Testing of specimens investigates the behaviour on load deflection, confinement effect, and the strength of the columns. The experimental observations were shown by load-deflection curves. Various characteristics such as strength, stiffness, ductility and failure mode are discussed. The predicted load versus deformation relationships are in good agreement with beam-column test results. The DSCFT columns in-filled with SCC show good strength and ductility. Modified equations are suggested to find the ultimate compressive strength of DSCFT columns filled with SCC.
Keywords : Composite; Double skinned concrete filled steel tubular columns; D/t thickness, fabrication and casting, load deflection, ductility.
LIST OF NOTATIONS |
|
fCK | Characteristic compressive strength of concrete |
SCC | Self compacting concrete |
C | Confinement factor |
fy
fsyi fsyo |
Yield strength of steel Yield strength of the inner steel tube Yield strength of the outer steel tube |
W/C | Water cement ratio |
C.F | Compacting factor |
L | Effective length of the column |
Nue | Experimental ultimate load |
Nuo | Theoretical ultimate load |
SI | Strength index |
DI | Ductility index |
Ac, As | Area of concrete and steel tube, respectively |
Asc | Cross-sectional area of the composite section (=Aso + Ac + Asi) |
Asco
(=Aso + Ac) |
Cross-sectional area of the outer steel tube and the sandwiched concrete |
Asi | Cross-sectional area of the inner steel tube |
Aso | Cross-sectional area of the outer steel tube |
D | Outside diameter of column |
NEC4 | Ultimate axial load of composite column |
to | Thickness of outer steel tube |
ti | Thickness of inner steel tube |
DSCFT | Double skinned Concrete-filled steel tube |
CHS | Circular hollow section |
Di | Dia. of inner steel tube |
Do | Dia. of outer steel tube |
Nue | Experimental ultimate strength |
Nuo | Predicted ultimate strength from theoretical model |
X | Hollow section ratio, (Di/(Do-2to)) |
^ | Slenderness ratio (=L/i ) |
i | Radius of gyration of CFDST =(Isc/Asc)1/2 |
Isc | Second moment of area for CFDST cross-section |
1.INTRODUCTION
Cold-formed steel tubular structures are being increasingly used for structural applications. This is due to the aesthetic appearance, high corrosion resistance, ease of maintenance and ease of construction. Hollow columns consisting of two concentric circular thin steel tubes with filler between them have been investigated for different applications. Figure 1 shows the hollow cold formed steel column.
In composite construction, the concrete and steel are combined in such a fashion that the advantages of both the materials are utilized effectively in composite column. The lighter weight and higher strength of steel permit the use of smaller and lighter foundations. The subsequent concrete addition enables the building frame to easily limit the sway and lateral deflections. Hollow column has less self weight and a high flexural stiffness and hence its usage in seismic zone proves promising. It reduces requirements on labor and construction time and maintains the construction quality.
SOME APPLICATIONS OF DSCFT COLUMNS
Submerged tube tunnels, nuclear containment, liquid and gas retaining structures, blast resistant shelter sea-bed vessels, legs of offshore platforms in deep water, large diameter columns , structures subjected to ice loading, high-rise bridge piers, light weight structures to possess enormous energy absorption capacity against earthquake loading.
PROGRESSIVE LOAD RESISTING CONCEPT OF CONCRETE FILLED TUBULAR COLUMNS (14)
It is the opinion of the many researchers that at the initial stage, the applied load is resisted individually by the steel and concrete elements. That too, the steel sustains larger part of the loading, until yielding. At the early stages of increment of loads, the poison’s ratio of concrete lies far below than that of the steel; whereas, steel tube causes no confinement on the concrete. With the increase in the longitudinal strain beyond a particular stage, an increase in the poison’s effect in the concrete attains, as a result of lateral expansion of the concrete. At this stage, the longitudinal and hoop stresses in the steel plate are becoming equal. Steel plate is bi-axially stressed and concrete being tri-axially stressed the expansion of the concrete takes place more than that of the steel. It is followed by the redistribution of load from concrete to outer steel mainly. At this stage, the steel shows hardening character similar to uniaxial stress-strain hardening.
Table 1 Summary of the composite column details
Identity | Do (mm) | Di(mm) | to (mm) | ti (mm) | L (mm) | Grade | X | ^ |
N |
DS-140-78-300 |
140 |
78 |
2.03 |
1.63 |
300 |
M30 |
0.57 |
5 |
3 |
DS-140-78-500 |
140 |
78 |
2.03 |
1.63 |
500 |
M30 |
0.57 |
8 |
3 |
DS-114-78-300 |
114 |
78 |
2.03 |
1.63 |
300 |
M30 |
0.71 |
8.3 |
3 |
DS-114-78-500 |
114 |
78 |
2.03 |
1.63 |
500 |
M30 |
0.71 |
13.8 |
3 |
DS-78-38-300 |
78 |
38 |
2.03 |
1.63 |
300 |
M30 |
0.51 |
7.5 |
3 |
DS-78-38-500 |
78 |
38 |
2.03 |
1.63 |
500 |
M30 |
0.51 |
12.5 |
3 |
Figure.2 Fabrication of Pipes-Cutting
Figure.3 Fabrication of Pipes welding
3. CASTING OF TEST SPECIMENS
The self compacting concrete mix used was prepared by mixing the ingredients of measured quantity as given in this table 2 for the desired grade of M30.
Table 2 Mix proportions
Sl.No |
Material |
Ingredients for M30 grade |
1 |
Cement (kg/m3) |
225 |
2 |
Fine aggregate (kg/m3) |
972 |
3 |
Coarse aggregate (kg/m3) |
708 |
4 |
Fly ash (kg/m3) |
225 |
5 |
Conplast Sp430 (kg/m3) |
3.6 |
6 |
Glenium Stream2 (kg/m3) |
1.35 |
7 |
W/Cm (Cm=C+FA) |
0.39 |
Self Compacting Concrete of 1: 1.39 : 3.1 with w/c ratio of 0.5 of coarse aggregate with maximum size of 6 mm. The companion specimens of three cubes, three prismatic and three cylindrical specimens were made and tested for arriving at the grade of concrete. During preparation of the test specimens, Self Compacting Concrete was pored for filling the annular space between the two concentric steel tubes. For proper filling of the specimens in the annular space, the self compaction was keenly monitored from spilling of the concrete which occurred simultaneously on the circumference of the each of the specimen section. The excess spilled concrete was then neatly and gently cleaned and the specimens were cured for 28 days in controlled humid condition. The specimens were wiped dry and cleaned. The top and bottom surfaces of concrete were inspected for level surface. A slight shrinkage of concrete around 1 to 2mm was noted and the same was filled with plaster of paris, at least three days prior to the testing of the specimens. Painting specimens is done for enabling easy identification of failure pattern. Then, the specimens were subjected to testing.
SPECIMEN DESCRIPTIONS
The specimens are labeled in a fashion that the first two alphabets describe the number of steel sheaths used were double (DSCFT).There are three numbers followed by the first two alphabets. Out of which, the first number indicates the outer diameter of the steel tubes, second number on the right, indicates the inner diameter of the steel tubes, third number on the right indicates the length of the steel tubes used.
4.TEST SETUP AND PROCEDURE
The entire tests were carried out using 1000 kN electronic universal testing machine. The DSCFT column specimens were hinged at both ends. The specimens were kept at the eccentricity of (e/b=0.2) from the center. This setup is made to achieve eccentricity of the applied load. The test arrangement and instrumentation are shown in Figure 6. An initial load of about 5 KN was applied to hold the specimen to the plumb line. Magnetic type dial gauges were used to measure the deflections at mid span and at 0.2height of the specimens from the end.
Eccentric compressive load was applied with an increment of 10KN. Each load is kept for around 2 minutes. For each load increment, the deformations were recorded. All specimens were subjected to load up to failure. Each specimen consumed almost 30 minutes for testing. Figure 7 shows the prepared specimens at the loading state.
5.RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
5.1 Failure Mode
Almost all columns fail in the same pattern of overall buckling and local buckling of outer steel plate in compression flange in the vicinity of mid height leads the failure. It was followed by the further propagation of local buckling at a distance of almost at equal to the outer diameter of the specimen. It was found that because of the infill of concrete, the tested beam-columns behaved in a relatively ductile manner and testing proceeded in a smooth and controlled way. The enhanced structural behavior of the composite specimens can be explained in terms of ‘‘composite action’’ between the steel tubes and the filled SCC concrete.
Table 3 Geometrical properties of the specimens
Specimen ID |
Di (mm) |
Do (mm) |
L (mm) |
L/Do |
^ |
X |
fck (Mpa) |
Fy (Mpa) |
Do/to |
Di/ti |
to/ti |
DS-140-78-500 |
78 |
140 |
500 |
2.1 |
5 |
0.57 |
30 |
250 |
68.97 |
47.85 |
1.25 |
DS-140-78-300 |
78 |
140 |
300 |
3.6 |
8 |
0.57 |
30 |
250 |
68.97 |
47.85 |
1.25 |
DS-114-78-500 |
78 |
114 |
500 |
2.6 |
8.3 |
0.71 |
30 |
250 |
56.16 |
47.85 |
1.25 |
DS-114-78-300 |
78 |
114 |
300 |
4.4 |
13.8 |
0.71 |
30 |
250 |
56.16 |
47.85 |
1.25 |
DS-78-38-500 |
38 |
78 |
500 |
3.8 |
7.5 |
0.51 |
30 |
250 |
38.42 |
47.85 |
1.25 |
DS-78-38-300 |
38 |
78 |
300 |
6.4 |
12.5 |
0.51 |
30 |
250 |
38.42 |
47.85 |
1.25 |
Table 4 Details of specimen with their properties and strength of concrete
Specimen ID |
Ultimate load (kN) |
PEC4 (kN) |
COV |
SI |
CF |
ACI CODE and AS CODE with CF (kN) |
|||
DS-140-78-500 |
476 |
442 |
0.93 |
|
|
566 |
|||
DS-140-78-300 |
465 |
442 |
0.95 |
1.05 |
1.09 |
566 |
|||
DS-114-78-500 |
385 |
320 |
0.83 |
1.20 |
1.95 |
396 |
|||
DS-114-78-300 |
353 |
320 |
0.91 |
1.10 |
1.95 |
396 |
|||
DS-78-38-500 |
273 |
199 |
0.73 |
1.36 |
1.77 |
248 |
|||
DS-78-38-300 |
235 |
199 |
0.85 |
1.18 |
1.77 |
248 |
5.2 Behaviour Of Columns
This section reports the discussion of test data. To have a comparative study of the failure of HCC columns, their behaviour was studied with respect to local buckling, formation and development of cracks, crushing of compression concrete and yielding of tension steel.
5.4 Modes Of Failure
Various failure patterns of hollow columns are in the following figures. In Figure.10 Elephant foot and lateral buckling failure of hollow column are shown. In Figure.11 Local buckling of steel plates are shown. In Figure.12 Kink failure pattern is shown. In Figure.13 Folding of plates in hollow column are shown.
5.5 Theoretical Model
Hollow columns are clearly intermediate between steel and reinforced concrete columns. However, the design philosophy for each of these two structural members is fundamentally different. Steel columns are treated as concentric in that they are loaded through their centroids, but with due allowances being made for residual stresses, initial out of straightness and slight eccentricities of the load. The basis of the design of steel column is instability or buckling, and any moment which act at the ends of the column are then incorporated by reducing the axial load by way of an interaction equation.
The approach for RC Columns is quite different than that for steel columns in that the loads are considered to be eccentric to the centroid. The failure is generally, but not always, attributable to cross- section, material failure, and is based on interaction curve as in IS- 456-2000.
Because of the similarity of hollow columns to both steel and concrete columns, there has been a great deal of debate by researchers as to which approach should be adopted. Short or stub columns are clearly governed by cross section failure, while long or slender columns are prone to buckling. Perhaps the most logical treatment to date is that provided by Euro code. The behavior of hollow columns can best treated by a combination of both approaches.
Table.5 Results of Theoretical Analysis
Identity |
Grade |
X |
^ |
E |
Nue |
Nuo |
SI |
DI |
DS-140-78-300 |
M30 |
0.57 |
5 |
1.09 |
476 |
452 |
1.127 |
0.660 |
DS-140-78-500 |
M30 |
0.57 |
8 |
1.09 |
465 |
447 |
1.123 |
0.646 |
DS-114-78-300 |
M30 |
0.71 |
8.3 |
1.95 |
385 |
327 |
1.223 |
0.801 |
DS-114-78-500 |
M30 |
0.71 |
13.8 |
1.95 |
353 |
322 |
1.154 |
0.737 |
DS-78-38-300 |
M30 |
0.51 |
7.5 |
1.77 |
273 |
201 |
1.281 |
0.676 |
DS-78-38-500 |
M30 |
0.51 |
12.5 |
1.77 |
235 |
197 |
1.209 |
0.758 |
6.CONCLUSIONS
The following points were concluded from the experimental works carried out:
• The SCC of required characteristic strength is found after trial and error procedure.
• The fresh and hardened concrete tests are performed to determine the rheoplastic properties and the strength properties of concrete.
• The buckling failure can be avoided and the load carrying capacity can be increased by lowering the slenderness ratio for hollow columns and RC columns.
• It was observed from the tests, that the failure modes of the hollow composite columns depend on slenderness ratio. When the slenderness ratio is very less, the column fails due to yielding of steel and crushing of concrete under direct compression. When slenderness ratio is large, the column fails by elastic buckling.
• The deflection is low where L/r ratio is 5. The deflection rate considerably increased when L/r ratio is 13.8 compared with other ratios.
• By increasing the hollowness ratio, the load carrying capacity increases but with the larger Di/tsi ratio, the failure is due to buckling, so the hollowness ratio should be kept between 0 and 0.8.
• The strength index, confinement factor and ductility index decreases with increase in D/t ratio (i.e. the composite action of steel tube and core concrete becomes smaller). Hence D/t ratio should be minimum.
• For the increase of slenderness ratio by 3 the ultimate load decreases by 10.5%.
REFERENCES
1. Xiao-Ling Zhao *, Raphael Grzebieta, “Strength and ductility of concrete filled double skin (SHS inner and SHS outer) tubes”,Thin-Walled Structures 40 (2002) 199–213.
2. Mohamed Elchalakani, Xiao-Ling Zhao , Raphael Grzebieta, “ Tests on concrete filled double-skin (CHS outer and SHS inner) composite short columns under axial compression”, Thin-Walled Structures 40 (2002) 415–441.
3. Xiao-Ling Zhao ,Byoungkee Han , Raphael H. Grzebieta, ”Plastic Mechanism Analysis Of Concrete-Filled Double-Skin (Shs Inner And Shs Outer) Stub Columns”, Thin-Walled Structures 40 (2002) ,815–833.
4. Lin-Hai Han, Zhong Tao, Hong Huang, Xiao-Ling Zhao ,”Concrete-filled double skin (SHS outer and CHS inner) steel tubular beam-columns”, Thin-Walled Structures 42 (2004) 1329–1355.
5. Lin-Hai Han , Guo-Huang Yao,” Experimental behaviour of thin-walled hollow structural steel (HSS) columns filled with self-consolidating concrete (SCC)”, Thin-Walled Structures 42 (2004) 1357–1377.
6. Zhong Tao , Lin-Hai Han , Xiao-Ling Zhao, “Behaviour of concrete-filled double skin (CHS inner and CHS outer) steel tubular stub columns and beam-columns”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 60 (2004) 1129–1158.
7. Dalin Liua , Wie-Min Ghob, “Axial load behaviour of high-strength rectangular concrete-filled steel tubular stub columns”, Thin-Walled Structures 43 (2005) 1131–1142.
8. Lin-Hai Han, Guo-Huang Yao, Xiao-Ling Zhao, “ Tests and calculations for hollow structural steel (HSS) stub columns filled with self-consolidating concrete (SCC)”., Journal of Constructional Steel Research 61 (2005) 1241–1269.
9. Lin-Hai Han, Hong Huang, Zhong Tao, Xiao-Ling Zhao, “Concrete-filled double skin steel tubular (CFDST) beam–columns subjected to cyclic bending”,Engineering Structures 28 (2006) 1698–1714.
10. Zhong Tao, Lin-Hai Han, “Behaviour of concrete-filled double skin rectangular steel tubular beam–columns”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62 (2006) 631–646.
11. Muhammad Naseem Baig FAN Jiansheng, NIE Jianguo “Strength of Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Columns”-2006,Vol 11, 657-666
12. Zhi-wu Yu, Fa-xing Ding, C.S. Cai, “Experimental behavior of circular concrete-filled steel tube stub columns” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 63 (2007) 165–174.
13. Zhong Tao, Lin-Hai Han, Dong-Ye Wang, “Experimental Behavior of concrete-filled stiffened thin walled steel tubular columns”, Thin-Walled Structures 45 (2007) 517-527.
14. Lin-Hai Han, Guo-Huang Yao, Zhong Tao, “Behaviors of concrete-filled steel tubular members subjected to combined loading”, Thin-Walled Structures 45 (2007) 600–619.
15. Artiomas kuranovas, Audronis Kazimieras Kvedaras, “Behaviour of Hollow Concrete –filled Steel Tubular Composite Elements” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 2007,Vol XIII, No.2, 131-141.
16. E K Mohanraj Dr S Kandasamy “Experimental Behaviour of Axially Loaded Hollow Steel Columns In-filled with Concrete”, IE(I) Journal-CV- Vol 88, February 2008.
17. Eurocode 4 DD ENV 1994-1-1. ‘Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures’. Part 1.1, General Rules and Rules for Buildings, British Standards Institution, London, 1994.
18. ACI Committee 318. ‘Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete’. ACI 318-95, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 1995.
19. Australian Standards1 AS3600 and AS4100. ‘Reinforced Concrete Structures and Steel Structures’. Standards Australia, Sydney, 1994.
20. Prof.Okamura,Prof.Ozama , No1, Pg.5-15.
We are thankful to Sir R.B.KARTHIKA for publishing his research work here on engineeringcivil.com.We hope this research paper will help many civil engineers around the world in understanding the behavior of Hollow Double Skinned Steel Concrete Composite Columns.
If you have a query, you can ask a question here.
This journalgives me usefulinformation on testing and analysis of composite columns. Very much interesting one. Nice work
Hi, Very helpful study.
But perhaps I’m reading it wrong: It looks like so far you have only studied the behavior of relatively short columns. Right?
I’m of course interested in how a column of conventional height fares – say 250cm. Is there some way to interpolate your studies to that length? Perhaps you have indeed done that already and I failed to see it. Or perhaps that is a topic of further study?
Thanks,
Chris Weller
Cambridge, MA